Since the second semester started I have learnt a lot considering both Maya and film studies. The lectures were always very informative giving us a great opportunity to have a better understanding on film and the assignments we got helped in gaining knowledge on how Maya worked.
On film analysis I have learnt way more than I have ever imagined I could. Not just during the lectures, but while reading some additional books as well such as The Filmmaker’s Eye, or The Cinema As Art. I’ve never thought before how much just the angle of the camera could mean to the narrative of a story. I have tried to apply this knowledge to the final project we got this year, the 30 second animation.
Our first assignment, the schematic and the artefact gave me a much deeper view into how a good film is built up. For the schematic we had to thing through Citizen Kane scene by scene, analysing every character and every action to find the connection between them. To come up with a good artefact we needed to understand the main meaning under the surface.
The next assignment, the animation, was really hard work considering the fact that there was only two of us working on it properly. Although looking back now I wouldn’t change teammembers, because I most definitely wouldn’t have learnt this much in Maya if I had the chance to let others do parts of the animation. We got a lot of help from members of other teams, but I had to figure out almost everything by myself.
I still have a lot to learn, but I feel like during this academic year I have improved a great amount.
- Citizen Kane (1941) Directed by Orson Welles.
- Mercado, G. (2010). The Filmmaker’s Eye.
- Stephenson, R. and Phelps, G. (1989). The Cinema As Art.